PDA

View Full Version : Why USC Won't Win The PAC 10...



The Remnant
8/9/2009, 09:32 AM
Posted by ESPN.com's Ted Miller



1. The schedule is unfavorable: Over an eight-week span, the Trojans will be on the road at Ohio State, at California, at Notre Dame and at Oregon. That's about as tough a schedule as a team can have: two long trips across time zones and visits to the Trojans' likely top competition in the conference -- both of whom could be ranked in the top 10 by game week. Moreover, tough road games are even tougher when you are inexperienced, particularly at quarterback. Finally, USC has lost eight games since 9/22/02. Six of those losses came in Pac-10 road games (the others were 2007 vs. Stanford and the 2005 national title game vs. Texas).
2. Only three starters return on defense: Sure, that's a bit misleading considering the depth of experience in the secondary. And, oh yeah, the Trojans reserve of young talent is unmatched in college football. But whatever the athletic ability, a lack of experience could end up leading to more mistakes than in the past. Something like: "I thought you were spying Jahvid on that play!"
3. No matter who starts, the quarterback will be green: It used to be -- before Pete Carroll arrived at Heritage Hall -- that a Pac-10 team couldn't hope for a conference title without experience at quarterback. The Trojans have, of course, bucked that trend ever since Matt Leinart swaggered his way through his first start: a 23-zip pillaging at Auburn. Still, even the coolest player doesn't always hit the point at the craps table. At some point, the odds are a new starting quarterback is going to play like one for USC -- particularly when the venue is the Horseshoe or Autzen Stadium.
4. Both specialists will be new: USC is going to lose the Pac-10 because it's breaking in a new kicker and a new punter? Well, that's the sort of thing that could cost a team a close game: a shanked punt here, a missed field goal or extra point there. Anyone remember Ryan Killeen's missed extra point at Washington State in 2002 or his missed 39-yard field goal in the triple-OT loss to California the following year? Or David Buehler's blocked PAT vs. Stanford in 2007?
5. There's been a lot of staff turnover of late: The Trojans have new offensive and defensive coordinators as well as new defensive line and special-teams coaches. Sure, a lot of the talk this spring was of "upgrades." And defensive coordinator Rocky Seto, a longtime USC assistant, and D-line coach Jethro Franklin, who returned for his second stint with the team, aren't new faces around the program. Still, that's a lot of transitioning for a squad.
6. It's possible an NCAA ruling in the Reggie Bush case could be a distraction: Signs point to the seemingly endless Bush case actually, you know, ending sometime soon -- whether that's before the season begins or before the first of the year. While the smart money is on the Trojans not getting hammered -- unless something else comes up there is little evidence that ties USC to Bush's alleged improprieties -- any type of ruling will cause a period of hullabaloo that could distract from the task at hand.
7. The streak won't go on forever: Hey, history tells us that no dynasty lasts forever. Just ask the Mings.

Flagstaffsooner
8/9/2009, 09:38 AM
Yeah ND will be tough.:confused:

oudivesherpa
8/9/2009, 09:49 AM
USC talent is just so much better, even though inexperienced, I think Ted Miller's ESPN statement is similar to Andre Ware on OU, something to grab attention, but at the end of the day it will be USC as the PAC 10 champion.

stoopified
8/9/2009, 09:57 AM
I hope USC sucks BUT they do have the best talent money can buy.

badger
8/9/2009, 09:59 AM
Yeah ND will be tough.:confused:
Now, now, they beat Hawaii in their bowl which was IN HAWAII, giving Hawaii a homefield advantage, and as we all know, Hawaii was a BCS buster who went undefeated and to a BCS game where they defeated Georgia, declaring a fake national championship like all the previous BCS busters and thus, Notre Dame deserves all respect in the world for defeating these almost-national champions.

Oh wait... Hawaii lost to Georgia, did not go undefeated, proving that their previously undefeated season was a total fluke. Their coach was bought out of Hawaii with a big SMU contact (tee hee) and the only way they get bowl eligible is by playing in a sub-standard conference.

Oh wait... this is supposed to be about Notre Dame. They suck. End of story :D

Eielson
8/9/2009, 10:03 AM
He wrote the article, but I doubt he'll be taking any bets against USC winning it.

The Remnant
8/9/2009, 10:07 AM
and..

8. I can't stand those smug, arrogant bastards.

meoveryouxinfinity
8/9/2009, 10:17 AM
It's possible an NCAA ruling in the Reggie Bush case could be a distraction: Signs point to the seemingly endless Bush case actually, you know, ending sometime soon -- whether that's before the season begins or before the first of the year. While the smart money is on the Trojans not getting hammered -- unless something else comes up there is little evidence that ties USC to Bush's alleged improprieties -- any type of ruling will cause a period of hullabaloo that could distract from the task at hand.

Ummm hello? The school is supposed to keep tabs on their players. USC is in the wrong by not being in the right. Just like we were with Bomar, except USC is in 1000x deeper.



Sorry go on.

Flagstaffsooner
8/9/2009, 10:35 AM
The Oregon game depends on the ref and the booth, as always.

rainiersooner
8/9/2009, 11:20 AM
They could lose to OSU, but I don't see anyone in the PAC 10 beating them. If they do lose in conference, it's going to be a total egg on a road game, like at Washington or something lame like that.

Salt City Sooner
8/9/2009, 11:44 AM
That's exactly where they always slip up though. Except for the VY game, SC hasn't lost an OOC game since KSU beat them in Manhattan back in 2002. It's the Pac-10 that always seems to jump up & bite them in the butt.

SoonerSoph
8/9/2009, 12:28 PM
I don't understand how Oh-state and Notre Dame have anything to do with USC winning the Pac-10, Ted.

badger
8/9/2009, 12:49 PM
They could lose to OSU...

But if they were gonna lose to OSU, which QB would be the one throwing his mouth guard in a temper tantrum after the loss?

That's the biggest question, because there is no question that they will once again embarrass themselves and lose to Oregon State :D

I think most are saying the froshie hotshot will be the starter, and therefore, the mouth guard thrower. I secretly would like to see MM be the one to fall flat on his face this season though

JLEW1818
8/9/2009, 01:21 PM
@ Oregon, @ Cal, @ Arizona State

@ Ohio state, and @ ND.. but it doesn't matter for the Pac 10

okcusooner
8/9/2009, 02:23 PM
I have a special hate for SC. Growing up a sooner fan in Southern Cal, the first time I ever got to see my Sooners live was in that heartbreaking 1981 game at the Coliseum. Monday at school was brutal.

Still, I think they will win the Pac-10, but I'd love to be proven wrong.

fadada1
8/9/2009, 03:42 PM
usc might win the pac10, but it will be interesting. their talent is still better than most, but a well coached team can beat out talent on any given saturday. i just don't think they'll blow out teams like they normally do. we'll see.

BoulderSooner79
8/9/2009, 03:52 PM
#1 reason USC will win the Pac10: All the other Pac10 teams suc and cower to the trojans. Sure they seem to lay an egg against one of their weak sisters each year, but that team never wins the conference.

Soonerfan88
8/9/2009, 07:56 PM
He is saying that the road trips to Ohio and Indiana will make it harder on the team - changing time zones causes travel fatigue even if it doesn't seem like that big of a deal.

And he's not going too far out on a limb as stupid losses within the conference have been USC's problem since 2005.

Dan Thompson
8/9/2009, 09:45 PM
Oregon St. lead from the start and beat USC last year at home.

BoulderSooner79
8/9/2009, 11:54 PM
Oregon St. lead from the start and beat USC last year at home.

And something similar has happen each of the last 3 years. But each time USC has still won the conference. That gets them an automatic backyard BCS bid along with some big10 team to play the role of whipping boy. I hope another pac10 team can finally get it done this year, but I'm not putting any $ on it.