PDA

View Full Version : Conference-by-Conference Predictions



meoveryouxinfinity
5/20/2009, 02:41 PM
Umm entering week 2 of summer break (1.5 weeks left until summer classes begin..ugh) and I have nothing better to do.

Pac-10
Schedules:

Arizona (http://arizona.rivals.com/schedule.asp)
Arizona State (http://thesundevils.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/asu-m-footbl-sched.html)
California (http://www.calbears.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/cal-m-footbl-sched.html)
UCLA (http://www.uclabruins.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/ucla-m-footbl-sched.html)
Oregon (http://www.goducks.com/SportSchedule.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=500&SPID=233)
Oregon State (http://www.osubeavers.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/orst-m-footbl-sched.html)
Southern California (http://usctrojans.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/usc-m-footbl-sched.html)
Stanford (http://www.gostanford.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/stan-m-footbl-sched.html)
Washington (http://www.gohuskies.com/sports/m-footbl/sched/wash-m-footbl-sched.html)
Washington State (http://wsucougars.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/wast-m-footbl-body.html)

Predictions:

Arizona: Arizona finished off the 2008 season with a 10 point win over No. 17 BYU in the Vegas Bowl. They ended the season 8-5, with their first bowl victory in 10 years. In 2009, Arizona will be looking to replace the quarterback position. The defense is experienced while the offense will be filled with fairly young guys. [depth chart (http://arizona.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp?Team=ARIZONA)]
They have a pretty tough road schedule (according to Pac-10 standards). They play @Iowa, @Oregon State, @Washington, @Cal, @ASU, and @USC. My gut says they go 3-3 at best. They have a shot at beating Iowa and should take it to win-less Washington. However, this is the Pac-10 we are talking about. At best they finish the season 8-4. But is their defense good enough to anchor them through the season? Realistically, they will finish 4th or 5th in the Pac-10, losing to the likes of USC, Oregon, Oregon State, and possibly Arizona State. I'd bet on them going bowling for the second year in a row, though.

Arizona State: ASU went 5-7 last year, finishing only above the Washingtons and UCLA last year in the Pac-10. ASU is NOT a good team. 6-6 is reaching for them in 2009. I see them losing @UGA, vs Oregon St, vs Cal, vs USC, @Oregon, and possibly dropping a game they "should have won" (Zona, the Washingtons, or UCLA). They'll be really lucky if they get to a bowl. I think they will, once again, finish 6th in the Pac-10.

California: Cal finished 4th in the Pac-10 last year, going 9-4 and beating Miami in the Emerald Bowl in their own back yard. In the third quarter of the Cal-Maryland game last year, UMD had a 28-6 lead. I think Cal will win this non-conference battle, however, I wouldn't be surprised to see UMD steal another one. I think Cal will lose at least 4 conference games, but they have a legit chance to upset USC at home on the first Saturday in October. I think they will finish 3rd in the conference, slightly outside of the top 25.

UCLA: Oh gah. They finished 8th in the conference last year, going 4-8, and I don't see it getting much better for the Bruins. I see them losing: @Tenn, @Stanford, vs Oregon, vs Cal, @Zona, @Oregon State, and @USC. Anyone else on their schedule, including K-State, has a chance at taking it to this direction-less team. I'd bet they finish 9th in the Pac-10.

Oregon: This year will be the inner-state fight for second in the conference: Oregon vs Oregon State. Both showed signs of whats to come in the future in 2008. Oregon finished 10-3, 2nd in the Pac-10, and absolutely shellacked Oklahoma State in the Holiday Bowl. They might have lost quite a bit of talent last year (including their coach), but their schedule is very promising--their road games include: @Boise, @UCLA, @Washington, @Stanford, and @Zona. @Boise (who they lost to last year at home) will be a very tough test. If they can get through this, they might come close to a 11-1 season. If they win all of their non-conference games (Boise, Purdue, Utah), they will be more than ready for the Pac-10. Plus, they definitely have a shot to beat USC at home. Last year they had a number of good wins, and I expect them to repeat and finish 2nd in the Pac-10.

Oregon State: Jaquizz Rodgers is awesome to watch (at least vs USC) but how will he react with a target on his back? His name is out there, can he live up to expectations? Can he be consistent? Oregon State finished 9-4 last year, 3rd in the Pac-10, and beating No. 20 Pitt in the most boring college football game ever witnessed. The final score was 3-0. I think OSU will lose vs Cinci in the non-conf, @USC, @Cal, and @Oregon, and possibly dropping another game along the way. 8-4 would be awesome for them but 7-5 is more realistic. I think they will finish 4th in the Pac-10.

Southern California: It's good to be a trojan, right? With one loss in the Pac-10, all of USC's national title hopes come crashing down. It should be a breeze in the Pac-10, but USC has a knack for losing one. This year they have a couple trap games on the schedule (well, when you're USC, what isn't a trap game?): most notably @Oregon and @Cal. They also play @ND (ha) and @Ohio State. I highly doubt they will get through their conference schedule unscathed, and would be very surprised if they escape with a huge victory in Columbus (I can however see them getting away with a Bush-push kind of win). October will be absolutely PIVOTAL for USC, where they play @Cal, @ND, Oregon State, and @Oregon. They will finish 1st the the Pac-10, but will lose a game (and hopefully a couple scholarships once the NCAA grows a pair).

Stanford: In 2008 they went 5-7. Expect them to slide a little bit in the Pac-10, Probably below Washington. Beating SJSU, and upsetting UCLA or Arizona State should be their goal. I think they will go 2-10, finishing last in the Pac-10.

Washington: Washington got so close on so many occasions in 2008, I was really pretty shocked they went win-less. They play vs LSU in the non-conference, which I expect them to keep up for at least a half. I say they get 3 wins this year, along with a 7th place finish. I also think they have more upside than Wazzu, UCLA, and Stanford combined: Jake Locker and a new coach (I don't even know his name but it's gotta be better than Willingham).

Washington State: WSU will have to improve quite a bit to get where they want to go (yes, even 8th place). Last year they got blown out in just about every game. This year this schedule is easier (SMU, and ND in place of Ok St and Baylor non-conference). I think they will almost certainly lose @USC, @Oregon, @Cal, @ND, @Zona, vs Oregon State, and probably @Washington. They will be very lucky to finish 8th in the conference.

2008 Pac-10 Standings
1. USC
2. Oregon
3. Oregon State
4. California
5. Arizona
6. Stanford
7. Arizona State
8. UCLA
9. Washington State
10. Washington


2009 Predicted Standings:
1. USC
2. Oregon
3. California
4. Oregon State
5. Arizona
6. Arizona State
7. Washington
8. Washington state
9. UCLA
10. Stanford

JLEW1818
5/20/2009, 03:46 PM
This is the year usc loses the pac 10, to Oregon.

Salt City Sooner
5/20/2009, 07:54 PM
I'll buy that, IF, their defense improves substantially this year. They weren't good on that side of the ball at all last year. Offensively, they should be fine. Masoli was quite the find.

meoveryouxinfinity
5/20/2009, 08:07 PM
I'll buy that, IF, their defense improves substantially this year. They weren't good on that side of the ball at all last year. Offensively, they should be fine. Masoli was quite the find.

Everyone knows the Pac-10 doesn't play defense.

They don't really play offense either, though.


Masoli HAS to be consistent for Oregon to live up to their expectations (they're on many top 15 pre-season lists)

soonerfan28
5/21/2009, 09:24 AM
This is the year usc loses the pac 10, to Oregon.

I'll second that.

I also think that Mike has Arizona in the top 3 in the conference.

rainiersooner
5/22/2009, 03:58 PM
Sarkasian is Washington's new coach - former offensive coordinator at USC (funnily enough, he ran into some recruiting violations early on, just like Kiffin...coincidence?? I doubt it!). He's young and inexperienced, but he brings a lot of fire, which is something that program needed. With a healthy Locker, I think UW can pull of 4 or 5 wins this season (Idaho, Stanford, Notre Dame, Oregon State, Washington State).

JLEW1818
5/22/2009, 04:44 PM
IN THE GENERAL SPORTS FORUM, PLEASE GO VOTE WHO WINS THE NBA FINALS AND OVER WHO. YOU WILL SEE THE THREAD.

RedstickSooner
5/22/2009, 05:50 PM
Why is everyone so bullish on Oregon? They've got even less experience on their O-line than we do. And this year, that's saying something.

rainiersooner
5/22/2009, 05:57 PM
I agree - I'm not impressed with them. I think Cal might have some success. PAC 10 is pretty weak this year.

meoveryouxinfinity
5/23/2009, 05:08 PM
Why is everyone so bullish on Oregon? They've got even less experience on their O-line than we do. And this year, that's saying something.

I think they will beat USC, and their schedule sets up nicely for them (except their non-conf...they will probably lose to boise).. look at their schedule. They play USC, Cal, ASU, and OSU at home. They only play AZ, Stanford, Washington, and UCLA on the road.
That and I think Masoli is a threat to those Pac-10 defenses.. but that being said, almost all of Oregon's success or failures will be on his shoulders.

I also think Cal will be pretty good, but their conference schedule will be a bit harder.

meoveryouxinfinity
5/23/2009, 05:10 PM
Sarkasian is Washington's new coach - former offensive coordinator at USC (funnily enough, he ran into some recruiting violations early on, just like Kiffin...coincidence?? I doubt it!). He's young and inexperienced, but he brings a lot of fire, which is something that program needed. With a healthy Locker, I think UW can pull of 4 or 5 wins this season (Idaho, Stanford, Notre Dame, Oregon State, Washington State).

Agreed. I wouldn't be surprised to see them do some damage this year. I just didn't gel last year. And I meant 3 wins in the Pac-10.