PDA

View Full Version : McCain is awesome!!!!



SoonerKnight
9/23/2008, 07:47 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26859857/page/2/

By Jackie Calmes and David D. Kirkpatrick

updated 29 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - One of the giant mortgage companies at the heart of the credit crisis paid $15,000 a month to a firm owned by Senator John McCain’s campaign manager from the end of 2005 through last month, according to two people with direct knowledge of the arrangement. The disclosure contradicts a statement Sunday night by Mr. McCain that the campaign manager, Rick Davis, had no involvement with the company for the last several years. Mr. Davis’s firm received the payments from the company, Freddie Mac, until it was taken over by the government this month along with Fannie Mae, the other big mortgage lender whose deteriorating finances helped precipitate the cascading problems on Wall Street, the people said.
They said they did not recall Mr. Davis doing much substantive work for the company in return for the money, other than speak to a political action committee composed of high-ranking employees in October 2006 on the coming midterm congressional elections. They said Mr. Davis’s his firm, Davis & Manafort, was kept on the payroll because of Mr. Davis’s close ties to Mr. McCain, the Republican presidential nominee, who was widely expected by 2006 to run again for the White House.

Mr. Davis took a leave from Davis & Manafort for the duration of the campaign, but as a partner and equity-holder continues to share in its profits.

Freddie Mac spokeswoman said the company would not comment. The McCain campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Long history of cultivating allies
Mr. McCain’s campaign has been attacking Senator Barack Obama, his Democratic rival, for his ties to former officials of the mortgage lenders, both of which have long histories of cultivating allies in the two parties to fend off efforts to restrict their activities. Mr. McCain has been running a television commercial suggesting that Mr. Obama takes advice on housing issues from Franklin D. Raines, a former chief executive of Fannie Mae, a contention flatly denied by Mr. Raines and the Obama campaign. Freddie Mac’s roughly $500,000 in payments to Davis & Manafort began immediately after Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in late 2005 disbanded an advocacy coalition that they had set up and hired Mr. Davis to run, the people familiar with the arrangement said.

Between 2000 and the end of 2005, Mr. Davis had received nearly $2 million as president of the coalition, the Homeownership Alliance, which the companies created to help them oppose new regulations and protect their status as federally chartered companies with implicit government backing. That status let them borrow cheaply, helping to fuel rapid growth but also their increased purchases of the risky mortgage securities that were their downfall.

On Sunday, in an interview with CNBC and the New York Times, Mr. McCain responded to a question about Mr. Davis’s role in the advocacy group by saying that his campaign manager “has had nothing to do with it since, and I’ll be glad to have his record examined by anybody who wants to look at it.”

Such assertions, along with McCain campaign television ads tying Mr. Obama to former Fannie Mae chiefs, have riled current and former officials of the two companies and provoked them to volunteer rebuttals of what they see as the McCain campaign’s inaccuracy and hypocrisy. The two officials with direct knowledge of Freddie Mac’s post-2005 contract with Mr. Davis spoke on condition of anonymity. One is a Democrat and the other a registered independent. Four other outside consultants, three Democrats and a Republican also speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that it was widely known that Mr. Davis was being paid though his firm.

As president of the Homeownership Alliance, Mr. Davis got $30,000 to $35,000 a month. Mr. Davis, along with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have characterized the alliance as a coalition of many housing industry and consumer groups to promote homeownership, but numerous current and former officials at both companies say the two mortgage companies created and bankrolled the operation to combat efforts by competitors to rein in their business. They dissolved the group at the end of 2005 as part of cost-cutting in the wake of accounting scandals and, at Freddie Mac, a lobbying scandal that forced out its former top Republican lobbyist.

Bias accusations against New York Times
On Monday, the McCain campaign accused The New York Times of bias for reporting the payments to Mr. Davis from the mortgage giants. Mr. Davis said that had worked not for the two companies but for the advocacy group, which included other nonprofit organization as well.

After the Homeownership Alliance was dissolved, Mr. Davis asked to stay on a retainer, the people familiar with the deal said. Hollis McLoughlin, who was chief of staff to Richard F. Syron, Freddie Mac’s chief executive, arranged for a new contract with Davis & Manafort, at the reduced rate of $15,000 a month, they said. Mr. Syron lost his job in the government takeover this month. Mr. McLoughlin, who through a spokeswoman declined to comment, was a former chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady in the first President Bush’s administration, and has longstanding Republican ties.

Mr. Davis was hired as a consultant, not a lobbyist, the officials said. Davis & Manafort in recent years has filed federal lobbying reports for a number of companies, including SBC Telecommunications, Fruit of the Loom, Comsat, Gtech, Airborne Express, BellSouth and Verizon—all businesses with legislative interests before the Senate Commerce Committee, where Mr. McCain has been chairman or senior Republican. It has filed no reports registering to lobby for Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.

Later in 2006, Mr. Davis was working on Mr. McCain’s emerging presidential campaign, as chief financial officer. The only thing that Freddie Mac officials could recall Mr. Davis doing for the company was the October 2006 pre-election forum with mid-level and senior executives who contribute to Freddie PAC, the company’s political action committee.

An electronic invitation to the employees, read by an official to the New York Times, said “Please join us for political food for thought” with Paul Begala, a longtime Democratic consultant, “and Rick Davis, former 2000 presidential campaign manager and current advisor to Senator John McCain.” Mr. Begala, who also was a paid consultant to Freddie Mac until this month, confirmed that the event took place.

Not unusual to have people on payrolls
A Freddie Mac executive said that as the event was being planned, and organizers were looking for a speaker from each party, “People at the office were saying, ‘Well, we have Rick Davis on contract and we never use him for anything. Why don’t we at least get him up here to talk like he knows what’s going on in the campaigns?”

It was not unusual for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to have well-connected people from both parties on their payrolls, but doing little work, in the high-flying days. The purpose, people who worked at the companies said, was bipartisan insurance against new regulations or loss of the implicit government guarantee, which seemed at risk during both the Clinton and current Bush administrations.

At least two other people associated with Mr. McCain have ties to either Freddie Mac. The lobbying firm of the Republican that Mr. McCain has enlisted to plan his transition to the White House should he be elected, William Timmons Sr., earned nearly $3 million from Freddie Mac between 2000 and its seizure, federal lobbying records show. Mr. Timmons is founder of Timmons & Co., one of Washington’s best-known lobbying shops. The payments were first reported by Bloomberg News.

Mark Buse, Mr. McCain’s chief of staff for his Senate office, also is a Freddie Mac alumnus. He and his former lobbying employer, ML Strategies, registered to lobby for the company in July 2003, and received $460,000 before the association ended after 2004.

Ties to mortgage giants
Mr. McCain and his advisers have argued that whatever connections Mr. Davis and other McCain campaign officials have had to the mortgage giants, Mr. McCain in the Senate has been an advocate for reforming them. And they have suggested that Mr. Obama is linked to the companies through donations from their employees ties to former officials there, including James Johnson, another former chief executive of Fannie Mae who was the head of Mr. Obama’s vice presidential search team until stepping aside after coming under criticism for getting a mortgage on favorable terms.

In an interview Tuesday with conservative talk-radio host Neal Boortz, Mr. McCain said, “I remember warning at that time that Fannie and Freddie were out of control and that they needed to be reined in. And, frankly, I warned that this kind of thing could lead to serious problems. Now, in full disclosure, I didn’t foresee something this huge, but certainly I saw the fundamentals there for serious problems when you have a quasi government agency acting the way they did.”

When Mr. Boortz noted approvingly that Mr. McCain had co-sponsored a Senate bill to mandate new regulations, Mr. McCain said, “I remember it very well.”

But a Freddie Mac official said Mr. McCain “never took on the role that some other Republicans did” to try to limit the companies. He named instead Senators Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, John Sununu of New Hampshire and Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina, all of whom were on the banking committee during recent years. “I remember working against a number of amendments and they were always introduced by Hagel and Sununu. John McCain was never anywhere to be found.”

A check of the records for the legislation that Mr. Boortz mentioned shows that Senator Hagel was the original sponsor on Jan. 26, 2005, and Senators Sununu and Dole were co-sponsors then. Mr. McCain did not sign on as a co-sponsor for more than a year, on May 25, 2006.
This article, "McCain Aide’s Firm Was Paid by Freddie Mac," first appeared in the New York Times.

StoopTroup
9/23/2008, 08:12 PM
Explain to me his awesomeness.

Curly Bill
9/23/2008, 08:22 PM
Explain to me his awesomeness.

If you had an hour you could read the post for yourself and hope to find out. ;)

SoonerKnight
9/23/2008, 08:24 PM
Explain to me his awesomeness.

I put it in bold.:D Besides, I was trying to stimulate a debate. I really don't care for McCain.

Curly Bill
9/23/2008, 08:26 PM
I put it in bold.:D Besides, I was trying to stimulate a debate. I really don't care for McCain.

You're kidding, we'd have never known. Besides we haven't debated anything on here in a long time. We mostly just tell the folks on the other side how wrong and stupid they are for being on the other side in the first place.

...and oh yeah: you're on the wrong side. :D

Sooner02
9/23/2008, 08:26 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/22/AR2008092202583.html

McCain Loses His Head
By George F. Will

"The queen had only one way of settling all difficulties, great or small. 'Off with his head!' she said without even looking around."

-- "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"

WASHINGTON -- Under the pressure of the financial crisis, one presidential candidate is behaving like a flustered rookie playing in a league too high. It is not Barack Obama.

Channeling his inner Queen of Hearts, John McCain furiously, and apparently without even looking around at facts, said Chris Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, should be decapitated. This childish reflex provoked The Wall Street Journal to editorialize that "McCain untethered" -- disconnected from knowledge and principle -- had made a "false and deeply unfair" attack on Cox that was "unpresidential" and demonstrated that McCain "doesn't understand what's happening on Wall Street any better than Barack Obama does."

To read the Journal's details about the depths of McCain's shallowness on the subject of Cox's chairmanship, see "McCain's Scapegoat" (Sept. 19, Page A22). Then consider McCain's characteristic accusation that Cox "has betrayed the public's trust."

Perhaps an old antagonism is involved in McCain's fact-free slander. His most conspicuous economic adviser is Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who previously headed the Congressional Budget Office. There he was an impediment to conservatives, including then-Congressman Cox, who as chairman of the Republican Policy Committee persistently tried and generally failed to enlist CBO support for "dynamic scoring" that would estimate the economic growth effects of proposed tax cuts.

In any case, McCain's smear -- that Cox "betrayed the public's trust" -- is a harbinger of a McCain presidency. For McCain, politics is always operatic, pitting people who agree with him against those who are "corrupt" or "betray the public's trust," two categories that seem to be exhaustive -- there are no other people. McCain's Manichean worldview drove him to his signature legislative achievement, the McCain-Feingold law's restrictions on campaigning. Today, his campaign is creatively finding interstices in laws intended to restrict campaign giving and spending. (For details, see The Washington Post of Sept. 17, Page A4; and The New York Times of Sept. 20, Page One.)

By a Gresham's Law of political discourse, McCain's Queen of Hearts intervention in the opaque financial crisis overshadowed a solid conservative complaint from the Republican Study Committee, chaired by Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas. In a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, the RSC decried the improvised torrent of bailouts as a "dangerous and unmistakable precedent for the federal government both to be looked to and indeed relied upon to save private sector companies from the consequences of their poor economic decisions." This letter, listing just $650 billion of the perhaps more than $1 trillion in new federal exposures to risk, was sent while McCain's campaign, characteristically substituting vehemence for coherence, was airing an ad warning that Obama favors "massive government, billions in spending increases."

The political left always aims to expand the permeation of economic life by politics. Today, the efficient means to that end is government control of capital. So, is not McCain's party now conducting the most leftist administration in American history? The New Deal never acted so precipitously on such a scale. Treasury Secretary Paulson, asked about conservative complaints that his rescue program amounts to socialism, said, essentially: This is not socialism, this is necessary. That non sequitur might be politically necessary, but remember that government control of capital is government control of capitalism. Does McCain have qualms about this, or only quarrels?

On "60 Minutes" Sunday evening, McCain, saying "this may sound a little unusual," said that he would like to replace Cox with Andrew Cuomo, the Democratic attorney general of New York who is the son of former Gov. Mario Cuomo. McCain explained that Cuomo has "respect" and "prestige" and could "lend some bipartisanship." Conservatives have been warned.

Conservatives who insist that electing McCain is crucial usually start, and increasingly end, by saying he would make excellent judicial selections. But the more one sees of his impulsive, intensely personal reactions to people and events, the less confidence one has that he would select judges by calm reflection and clear principles, having neither patience nor aptitude for either.

It is arguable that, because of his inexperience, Obama is not ready for the presidency. It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed?

[email protected]

StoopTroup
9/23/2008, 08:29 PM
I put it in bold.:D Besides, I was trying to stimulate a debate. I really don't care for McCain.

I thought you might be being sarcastic but I'm tired and I need to go to bed ASAP...the room is starting to spin and I haven't even had a drink in days.

Curly Bill
9/23/2008, 08:30 PM
I thought you might be being sarcastic but I'm tired and I need to go to bed ASAP...the room is starting to spin and I haven't even had a drink in days.

Withdrawals are teh suck huh? ;) :P :D

SoonerKnight
9/23/2008, 08:31 PM
You're kidding, we'd have never known. Besides we haven't debated anything on here in a long time. We mostly just tell the folks on the other side how wrong and stupid they are for being on the other side in the first place.

...and oh yeah: you're on the wrong side. :D

I thought you were on the wrong side? :confused: After all each side thinks the other is wrong and then we forget to work together as Americans and do what is best for our country not the rich CEO's!!!!!!! But what can you expect from the other side? ;)

Curly Bill
9/23/2008, 08:32 PM
I thought you were on the wrong side? :confused: After all each side thinks the other is wrong and then we forget to work together as Americans and do what is best for our country not the rich CEO's!!!!!!! But what can you expect from the other side? ;)

Something we both can agree on -- the other side sucks! :D

StoopTroup
9/23/2008, 08:32 PM
Withdrawals are teh suck huh? ;) :P :D

I need some OVJ I think. :D

stoops the eternal pimp
9/23/2008, 08:35 PM
Who's awesome?

SoonerKnight
9/23/2008, 08:38 PM
Something we both can agree on -- the other side sucks! :D

Yes, but I said it better! :D

JohnnyMack
9/23/2008, 09:07 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/22/AR2008092202583.html

The part about Obama's inexperience vs. McCain's dismaying temperament made me giggle. It's very true and I wonder how McCain is going to come across in these debates? He can be abrupt and pointed, sounding very abrasive when he goes off the cuff (which is probably why he's been off limits to the press for the better part of two months now). We all remember when his handlers tried to soften him up we had the green backdrop fiasco. Obama on the other hand has a tendency to sound more like a professor than a politician. Obama is criticized for not having enough specifics in his rhetoric, I wonder if he sharpens that on Friday night? Their styles are not at all complementary. Should be a fun debate.

Curly Bill
9/23/2008, 09:10 PM
Their styles are not at all complementary. Should be a fun debate.

Someone offers me a million dollars I might watch it. :P

JohnnyMack
9/23/2008, 09:15 PM
Someone offers me a million dollars I might watch it. :P

I'll offer you a million dollars worth of Lehman Bros. stock.

mdklatt
9/23/2008, 09:28 PM
I'll offer you a million dollars worth of Lehman Bros. stock.

Which falls faster, a pound of feathers or a pound of rocks?


:D

Curly Bill
9/23/2008, 09:28 PM
I'll offer you a million dollars worth of Lehman Bros. stock.

I'm a long way from retirement, it could maybe recover eventually ???

Hot Rod
9/23/2008, 09:37 PM
Crap! I misread the thread title. I thought it said "McClain was awesome!!!!". I was hoping it was about teh Die Hards.

tommieharris91
9/23/2008, 10:18 PM
I'll offer you a million dollars worth of Lehman Bros. stock.

At $.13, it ain't got much further to fall than it already has.

SoonerKnight
9/24/2008, 02:00 AM
wow! what a deal!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Frozen Sooner
9/24/2008, 02:09 AM
At $.13, it ain't got much further to fall than it already has.

I bet the offer was at par. JM's a sneaky bastard. Of course, that's still $130,000 at the market.

By the way, notice what WaMu stock's been doing lately? And they STILL can't find a buyer?

Ike
9/24/2008, 07:41 PM
I bet the offer was at par. JM's a sneaky bastard. Of course, that's still $130,000 at the market.

By the way, notice what WaMu stock's been doing lately? And they STILL can't find a buyer?

Do they actually do anything other than send out credit card applications to the entire nation every other day?