PDA

View Full Version : Good Morning...Girls sports changes forever



Okla-homey
6/23/2008, 06:44 AM
June 23, 1972: Title IX enacted

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/9879/tit9f4293bee44c40218035df9.jpg

Thirty-six years ago on this day in 1972, Title IX of the education amendments of 1972 is enacted into law. Title IX prohibits federally funded educational institutions from discriminating against students or employees based on sex. It begins:
"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

As a result of Title IX, any school that receives any federal money from the elementary to university level--in short, nearly all schools--must provide fair and equal treatment of the sexes in all areas, including athletics.

http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/4008/titvolleyballdigkb7.jpg

Before Title IX, few opportunities existed for female athletes. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), which was created in 1906 to format and enforce rules in men’s football but had become the ruling body of college athletics, offered no athletic scholarships for women and held no championships for women’s teams.

Furthermore, facilities, supplies and funding were lacking. As a result, in 1972 there were just 30,000 women participating in NCAA sports, as opposed to 170,000 men.

http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/6128/titt9nu5.jpg

Title IX was designed to correct those imbalances. Although it did not require that women’s athletics receive the same amount of money as men’s athletics, it was designed to enforce equal access and quality. Women’s and men’s programs were required to devote the same resources to locker rooms, medical treatment, training, coaching, practice times, travel and per diem allowances, equipment, practice facilities, tutoring and recruitment.

Scholarship money was to be budgeted on a commensurate basis, so that if 40 percent of a school’s athletic scholarships were awarded to women, 40 percent of the scholarship budget was also earmarked for women.

It also applies to non-sport activities such as school bands, cheerleaders, and clubs; however, social fraternities and sororities, gender-specific youth clubs such as Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts, and Girls State and Boys State are specifically exempt from Title IX requirements.

Since the enactment of Title IX, women’s participation in sports has grown exponentially. In high school, the number of girl athletes has increased from just 295,000 in 1972 to more than 2.6 million.

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/9290/tittbsportsparis450ik9.jpg

In college, the number has grown from 30,000 to more than 150,000. In addition, Title IX is credited with decreasing the dropout rate of girls from high school and increasing the number of women who pursue higher education and complete college degrees.

Despite these advancements, Title IX has not been without controversy.

Critics point out that while it may be helping female athletes, it can hurt male athletes when smaller schools are forced to cancel men’s programs to meet the strictures of the law. For example, here in Oklahoma, the University of Tulsa eliminated its mens baseball team in the mid-1980's, despite two earlier college world series appearances and a wealth of baseball talent in eastern Oklahoma.

http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/5553/tittranrowingtd6.jpg

Some groups claim that it has caused some schools to spend less money on non-revenue-generating men's sports programs such as wrestling, cross country, swimming, gymnastics, fencing and volleyball. This means that it is harder for men to get into large, Division I schools for small sports due to their over emphasis on football and other money making sports.

http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/7163/tit20061102swimteamgc9.jpg

olevetonahill
6/23/2008, 06:49 AM
If ya dont Like Losing , Get better !
MY bad . Its really a good thing ;)

SoonerStormchaser
6/23/2008, 06:50 AM
Shhhh Olevet...you don't want Oklahoma State to find that out!

olevetonahill
6/23/2008, 06:55 AM
Shhhh Olevet...you don't want Oklahoma State to find that out!

Go back to the thread where I was giving ya hell about wimmins !

Scott D
6/23/2008, 07:23 AM
Despite these advancements, Title IX has not been without controversy.

Critics point out that while it may be helping female athletes, it can hurt male athletes when smaller schools are forced to cancel men’s programs to meet the strictures of the law. For example, here in Oklahoma, the University of Tulsa eliminated its mens baseball team in the mid-1980's, despite two earlier college world series appearances and a wealth of baseball talent in eastern Oklahoma.

Some groups claim that it has caused some schools to spend less money on non-revenue-generating men's sports programs such as wrestling, cross country, swimming, gymnastics, fencing and volleyball. This means that it is harder for men to get into large, Division I schools for small sports due to their over emphasis on football and other money making sports.

The critics believe that because it's what the schools tell them. Truth is, the costs of the revenue sports have gone up in athletic budgets so much that athletic departments are actively looking for sports to cut. Then they turn around and blame it on Title IX when the players, coaches, and parents for that particular sport get huffy about it. Title IX has been more of a scapegoat for schools than the actual reason.

good jorb as usual though homey.

SoonerInKCMO
6/23/2008, 08:09 AM
Truth is, the costs of the revenue sports have gone up in athletic budgets so much that athletic departments are actively looking for sports to cut.

True - but if not for Title IX, it wouldn't be men's sports that were the primary victims of the cost-cutting.

SoonerInKCMO
6/23/2008, 08:10 AM
Also, since when is The Joker a female lacrosse player? :confused:

Scott D
6/23/2008, 08:24 AM
True - but if not for Title IX, it wouldn't be men's sports that were the primary victims of the cost-cutting.

eh, depends on the school. Some would be cutting men's sports regardless of Title IX. It just gives them an excuse when there is any complaining, even some have admitted as much.

Rutgers is a great example. They more than doubled their football budget after Schiano started winning, to do that they had to cut from other sports. The money had to come from somewhere, and it wasn't women's sports that caused the cuts there. Women's basketball is higher revenue for them than men's basketball.

Pricetag
6/23/2008, 10:49 AM
Also, since when is The Joker a female lacrosse player? :confused:
And what's with the ridiculous "eye mask" things they're wearing? Like it's not okay to get whacked in the eye with a stick or ball, but it's okay everywhere else on the head? Wear a helmet like the dudes, for Pete's sake.

royalfan5
6/23/2008, 11:00 AM
My Mom was a 3 sport college athlete in the early days of Title IX. She has a lot of fun stories about the lack of facilites and what not that were common. They never actually had locker rooms at the school, and had to practice softball indoors on an old gym floor. She got knocked cold once after the ball took a bad hop of the free throw line.

SoonerInKCMO
6/23/2008, 11:02 AM
A bad hop off a paint stripe ate her up? Is your mom Angel Berroa? ;)

royalfan5
6/23/2008, 11:05 AM
A bad hop off a paint stripe ate her up? Is your mom Angel Berroa? ;)

I really can't think of a good comeback for that. Well Played, Sir.