soonernija
12/2/2007, 11:15 AM
http://forums.hornfans.com/php/wwwthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=football&Number=5342158&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=all
Re: Yet another Big 12 title for OU.... [re: Pancho Negro]
OU is just better, period. The difference is systemic. And if we had Stoops, and OU had Mack, we'd kick OU's butt, year and in year out. Mack is fine, but Stoops is better.
__________________________________________________ _____
I'd take Stoops over Mack in a second.
I'd take conference titles over 10 win seasons. Print up your shirt for 10 win seasons. 4 of those are almost always against 3-4 DOG teams.
Our record has been inflated since Mack has been here. Only when Vince was here did we beat anyone of real consequence.
____________________________
Gen 5 what ever he has done tops us and if you think the 2 coaches are about equal in achievements, you better get those orange lenses off and check reality. I like Mack, but his record doesn't compare. We have won one Big 12 title to Stoops 5. He has played in 3 NC games and us one. You better believe that Aggie debacle put us way back in everything. We are fixing to get our butts kicked in recruiting. Did OU' d tonight look anything like ours? Not in any way shape or form. We are way behind them now.
__________________________________________________ __________
Hate to say it, but ou and Stoops flat out own UT and Mack right now. The last 2 years were due to Vince and the Bomar fiasco, nothing more. 6 out of 8 years losing to ou is UNACCEPTABLE!!!!!! Now, chalk up 2 straight losses to Texas A&M Aggies and let that sink in. 10-win seasons with this talent, against the likes of teams we play year-in and year-out is a very overrated stat. I am sick of that being some kind of measuring stick for success. Beating ou regularly and winning championships is the stick they should use. Anything less is pointless rationalization.
Re: Yet another Big 12 title for OU.... [re: Pancho Negro]
OU is just better, period. The difference is systemic. And if we had Stoops, and OU had Mack, we'd kick OU's butt, year and in year out. Mack is fine, but Stoops is better.
__________________________________________________ _____
I'd take Stoops over Mack in a second.
I'd take conference titles over 10 win seasons. Print up your shirt for 10 win seasons. 4 of those are almost always against 3-4 DOG teams.
Our record has been inflated since Mack has been here. Only when Vince was here did we beat anyone of real consequence.
____________________________
Gen 5 what ever he has done tops us and if you think the 2 coaches are about equal in achievements, you better get those orange lenses off and check reality. I like Mack, but his record doesn't compare. We have won one Big 12 title to Stoops 5. He has played in 3 NC games and us one. You better believe that Aggie debacle put us way back in everything. We are fixing to get our butts kicked in recruiting. Did OU' d tonight look anything like ours? Not in any way shape or form. We are way behind them now.
__________________________________________________ __________
Hate to say it, but ou and Stoops flat out own UT and Mack right now. The last 2 years were due to Vince and the Bomar fiasco, nothing more. 6 out of 8 years losing to ou is UNACCEPTABLE!!!!!! Now, chalk up 2 straight losses to Texas A&M Aggies and let that sink in. 10-win seasons with this talent, against the likes of teams we play year-in and year-out is a very overrated stat. I am sick of that being some kind of measuring stick for success. Beating ou regularly and winning championships is the stick they should use. Anything less is pointless rationalization.