PDA

View Full Version : Whitlock Article in KC Star



cheezyq
12/1/2007, 11:05 AM
Didn't see this posted anywhere. Normally Whitlock is a pretty good columnist, but I think he's got Tiger-itis like the rest of the city up here.

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/columnists/jason_whitlock/story/384740.html


Stoops and the Sooners sound scared
By JASON WHITLOCK
The Kansas City Star

Make sure you send Bob Stoops and the Oklahoma Sooners a thank-you note when this is over.

The arrogant, two-loss underachievers think they’re doing the Missouri Tigers a favor tonight by granting Chase Daniel and Co. a rematch.

When Stoops is right, I’m with him. Last year, incompetent, unethical officiating cost him a game at Oregon. He was right to complain, and I showed my support by disregarding the loss every time I filled out my AP top-25 vote.

But this week, Stoops and his coaching staff have gone overboard, sarcastically dismissing the notion that the Tigers took themselves out of the first Missouri-Oklahoma showdown with four turnovers.

Brent Venables, OU’s defensive coordinator, said he hopes the Sooners “luck” into another victory in tonight’s Big 12 Championship. Friday, at the pregame news conference, Stoops once again seemed perturbed when questioned about Missouri giving the game away.

“It’s just whatever perspective you want to take,” he said. “I mean, you can look at it different ways. The first interception we got the blitz on, pressure them. The ball goes right down the middle. Our guy makes a great cut right in front of the guy, intercepts the ball. Is that good defense or did they just give it to us? I don’t know.

“Their running back (Jeremy) Maclin, receiver, fabulous player, they run a quick sweep and they’re going to throw the ball. Most people suck up. Makes for a great highlight if we’re out of position and get fooled. But we stay in position, we’re over the top of them, underneath the receiver and intercept the ball. Is that good defense, good reaction or is that them giving it to us? Depends on how you want to write your article.

“So in the end, it doesn’t really matter. We had two turnovers, too. They take the lead in the fourth quarter when we drop a kickoff return. We fumble the ball and give them the ball in the short field. So we made our share of mistakes, as well. It’s just how you want to tell your story. That’s up to you to do.”

Well, here’s how I want to tell the story: Stoops and the Sooners are scared.

He’s the best coach in this league, and really had little competition for that honor. Mack Brown is a great recruiter and motivator. Stoops can outcoach Brown with his clipboard and headset tied behind his back. Texas is annoying, but Stoops can handle the Longhorns when there’s no Vince Young to contend with.

Nebraska’s program is in disarray. Bill Snyder retired, and the Wildcats are backing up. Texas A&M never seems to reach its full potential, and there’s no reason to believe Mike Sherman is going to change that. Kansas can win 11 games for the next 10 years and Stoops will never view the Jayhawks and Mark Mangino as threats. Stoops trained Mangino. Teachers rarely fear their pupils, and football teachers damn sure don’t fear a pupil stuck at a basketball school.

Mike Leach is a nut. He and Texas Tech are pesky, but they’ll never overthrow the king.

My point is Gary Pinkel and the Missouri Tigers are very, very dangerous. Pinkel went into Texas and stole Daniel, the Big 12’s best player. Daniel’s success, in my opinion, is more a slap at Stoops than Mack Brown.

Brown isn’t clever enough to see the potential in a Chase Daniel. Brown is a star-struck recruiter. He has Jeremy Crabtree and Rivals on speed dial. Stoops and his staff should’ve been all over Daniel.

And don’t think Stoops isn’t hot watching tape of Maclin. He was supposed to be a Sooner until Pinkel sweet-talked him into wearing black and gold.

Pinkel and Stoops, Oklahoma and Missouri are budding rivals. Stoops and Pinkel have similar aggressive coaching philosophies. They like trick plays. They’ll go for it on fourth down. They’re stubborn and cocky. They’re from Ohio.

Is Pinkel the equal of Stoops? No. Not yet anyway. If the Tigers win tonight and win the BCS title game, Pinkel will own just as many national titles as Stoops.

Stoops wants to put Pinkel and Missouri back in their place tonight, back where everyone else in the Big 12 is — looking up at Stoops and the Sooners. Stoops feels as if he’s already done it once this season, when the Sooners slapped Missouri by 10.

But sportswriters and the Missouri players believe the Tigers took themselves out of the first game with turnovers. No one believes, as far as I know, that Missouri should’ve won the first game. The belief is the teams are equal and Missouri didn’t give itself a chance to win.

I’ll admit that I’m wrong if the Sooners whip the Tigers tonight. I hope Stoops will acknowledge his error if the Tigers beat the Sooners.

sooner518
12/1/2007, 11:09 AM
Stoops has never lost to Mizzou. How exactly are they budding rivals?

And when was the last time OU ran a trick play? We hardly ever do

OUMonster
12/1/2007, 11:21 AM
So not agreeing with the notion that MU "should have won the game" and/or that their turnovers were any more costly than OU's turnovers is now arrogance?

LRoss
12/1/2007, 11:26 AM
Eh, my only real problem is the name-calling near the beginning. Other than that it's a Missouri guy writing from a Missouri perspective, and FROM THEIR PERSPECTIVE they DID give the game away, just like from an OU perspective we played a good 4th quarter and took the game (frankly, probably both perspectives have elements of truth).

The end is a little weak too, though, I suppose. How can he call out coach Stoops to "acknowledge his error" if we lose? What error? That his team made some good defensive plays last game? Has Stoops ever said "Our team is superior!" or "Chase Daniels eats boogers!" like it seems he's implying? Also, his conclusion that the teams are equal doesn't quite jive with the "I’ll admit that I’m wrong if the Sooners whip the Tigers tonight" conclusion, does it? So I guess I've talked myself into saying it IS a crap article, although I have no problem at all with 90% of the body.

The Maestro
12/1/2007, 11:34 AM
It blows my mind they feel that way when there is this stat from that game.

OU - 2 turnovers on our own side of the field = 14 Missouri points.

14 of the 24 they had until 12 seconds left.

Wake up. Both teams had key turnovers. We just sucked it up and overcame them.

Get better!!!

4bigoufans
12/1/2007, 11:34 AM
I watched a replay of the game on FSN on Thursday night to see if the tigers would have won the game. They only had the lead twice in the whole game. The first lead came off a turnover by OU. Then in the 4th they got the lead by 1 Point because Hartley missed an extra point. So the way I see it we gifted them the lead in the 4th quarter and whipped them up the last 12 minutes of the game. Last I checked the game goes 4 complete quarters. You can spin the outcome however you want. No turnovers in the CU came we win easy. Tech game patrick does not fumble first carry we win easy!!!