PDA

View Full Version : OU vs TT my game thoughts



Dan Thompson
11/19/2007, 01:08 PM
I found the total yardage stats where interesting

Rushing
Murray 19-94
Brown 9-32
Patrick 2-9
Knall 1-(-1) who is this?
Halzle 2-(-21)

Total 106 Is this a game low for the year?

Passing
Iglesias 7-73
Kelly 5-44
M.Johnson 4-95
Finley 1-36
Gresham 1-20 Not much TE activity, no 3 TE formations
Zaslaw 1-15
Chaney 1-9
Eldridge 1-9
Brown 1-3
Murray 1-(-3)

Return yards
103 - and I don't remember if we did anything with the field position on these.

All these TT receivers had more catches than our best. These are 40 of their 47 catches.

Crabtree 12 - 154
Crowford 11 - 81
Amendola 9 - 81
Morris 8 - 56

boomersooner82
11/19/2007, 01:26 PM
Mike Knall is the punter. He lost yardage on that fake attempt/poor snap/whatever the heck that was.

kevpks
11/19/2007, 01:28 PM
Mike Knall is the punter. He lost yardage on that fake attempt/poor snap/whatever the heck that was.

He is just not getting it done running the ball. I expect more of a burst and a couple spin moves next time.

budbarrybob
11/19/2007, 01:30 PM
I found the total yardage stats where interesting

Rushing
Murray 19-94
Brown 9-32
Patrick 2-9
Knall 1-(-1) who is this?
Halzle 2-(-21)

Total 106 Is this a game low for the year?

Passing
Iglesias 7-73
Kelly 5-44
M.Johnson 4-95
Finley 1-36
Gresham 1-20 Not much TE activity, no 3 TE formations
Zaslaw 1-15
Chaney 1-9
Eldridge 1-9
Brown 1-3
Murray 1-(-3)

Return yards
103 - and I don't remember if we did anything with the field position on these.

All these TT receivers had more catches than our best. These are 40 of their 47 catches.

Crabtree 12 - 154
Crowford 11 - 81
Amendola 9 - 81
Morris 8 - 56

were your thoughts deleted? i don't see them..
BOOMER SOONER!

TopDawg
11/19/2007, 01:31 PM
Gresham 1-20 Not much TE activity, no 3 TE formations


One nitpick: we did come out in this formation at least once. I know we put one of them in motion and I think we ran the ball. It's the first time I can recall that we've put one of the TEs in motion on that formation.

usmc-sooner
11/19/2007, 01:35 PM
[QUOTE=Dan Thompson]I found the total yardage stats where interesting



Passing
Iglesias 7-73
Kelly 5-44
M.Johnson 4-95
Finley 1-36
Gresham 1-20 Not much TE activity, no 3 TE formations
Zaslaw 1-15
Chaney 1-9
Eldridge 1-9
Brown 1-3
Murray 1-(-3)

I didn't realize we had so many guys throwing the ball

fadada1
11/19/2007, 01:42 PM
One nitpick: we did come out in this formation at least once. I know we put one of them in motion and I think we ran the ball. It's the first time I can recall that we've put one of the TEs in motion on that formation.
inakurit and completely made up.

TopDawg
11/19/2007, 01:44 PM
inakurit and completely made up.

THAT'S NOT TRUE! [hairGel]

OklahomaRed
11/19/2007, 01:49 PM
Why did we quit putting more than a 4 man rush pressure on Tech's QB?
More passes to the TE with 2nd string QB in.
Patrick pretty much handed the game to them with his fumble on 1st down and the subsequent injury to Bradford. Tech didn't need any encouragement after we had just scored a deffensive touchdown on them.
2nd string QB should start getting a few more snaps in practice.
I was glad we finally made a game of it in the 4th quarter.
Last couple of days have sucked being in the middle of Tech country. I'm going to have to break the next guy's fingers who holds up his "guns up" crap!

fadada1
11/19/2007, 01:52 PM
[hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel] [hairGel].